This year for our summer vacation, it's my
intention to take the wife and kids to our nation's capitol,
Washington, DC, so I can let my 12 year old son see where his
college money is going. I have explained to him that my tax
burden is his tax burden and that if he doesn't want the same
thing happening to his kids, he'll make it his life's work to
stamp out the growth of Democrats, liberals and other assorted
parasitical growths currently infesting the backside of Mr.
Madison's Republic. We are in full vacation anticipation mode,
having sat down at the kitchen table with the atlas and yellow
highlighter and marked out the route. My daughter is 18 and has
little interest in seeing the center of the free world, so I am
leaving her home with her grandpa to watch the house, dog, and
cats. My son will take a friend. Two adults and two twelve year
old boys, off to see the seat of our government.
When I was a kid, the summer vacation in the
car was an annual event. Usually to visit relatives. Family
driving vacations are not very common anymore. My wife doesn't
fly, so anything we want to see has to be accessible by
automobile, train, or boat. This year's trek will take us from
the Dallas, Texas area, north through Oklahoma, through
Missouri, across Illinois and Indiana, into Kentucky, West
Virginia, Virginia, a 4 day stay in D.C., southwest into
Tennessee, to Arkansas and back into Texas. If anyone on this
planet is allowed to be angry with the government over the high
price of gasoline, it's me.
The national energy debate has been holding
my attention as our vacation looms near. Basically, there are
two arguments. The Republicans tell us that the problem is
demand outstripping supplies and a shortage of new refining
capabilities preventing any short term increases in foreign
production from having an immediate impact. So the
Administration, which includes a President and Vice President
with real world energy experience, has proposed a policy which
will bring new refining capabilities on line to keep up with a
purposed increase in domestic production. Since you can't build
a new refinery quickly and since exploration and production of
new sources of petroleum take time also, the Republican Plan is
a long term process designed to give us a future of steady
supply and the refining capability to meet demand, thus
stabilizing prices. It also reduces our dependence on foreign
energy sources. Short term pain, long term gain.
Like most well thought out proposals from
conservatives, this set of policies is coherent, void of
emotional extremism, logical and it will work.
The other set of arguments is from the
Democrats. They tell us that the problem is demand outstripping
supplies and a shortage of refining capabilities are preventing
any short term increases in foreign production from having an
immediate impact. So, the Democrat leadership, consisting of
people without real world energy experience, has proposed a
policy which will continue to delay new refining capabilities
through crippling regulation and environmental roadblocks. They
also insist that the government artificially interfere in the
market by setting limits on what the private sector can charge
for gasoline and other energy sources while maintaining the
government's cut of the profits through high taxation. They will
block new exploration and production efforts so that caribou or
dolphins won't be offended by the sight of drilling activities
in either the barren Arctic or in the Gulf of Mexico. We will
remain highly dependent on foreign oil and they suggest we turn
off more lights. Short term stupidity, long term pain.
Like most well thought out proposals from
liberals, this set of policies is incoherent, void of logic,
based on environmental hysteria and will not work.
I think we should be wary of making energy
policy based on the suggestions of a political party that
appeals to people who think animals have rights, people who
think felons are mistreated, people who hold benefit dinners for
cop killers, and people who think taking money away from the
person who signs my paycheck will make the economy better. Due
to the lowered standards in public education over the last 30
years or so, we have a plurality of people who can't seem to
grasp the obvious. Our purposely "dumbed down" population is
growing and we are approaching the point where the really
ignorant people will control the purse strings of the informed.
Once we reach that point, the energy policy will consist of
lowering prices, regardless of supply or demand, in order to
placate blocks of voters.
On our vacation, we have choices very much
like the ones facing the country. We are going to take a trip
halfway across the country and back. Either my wife and I can
drive or we could opt to let the 12-year-old boys drive. I have
been driving for 30 years and my son has never driven. I have
carefully thought out my route based on my years of experience
going on long car trips. My son usually sleeps in the backseat
on long car trips. Looking at the two scenarios from an
objective perspective, I think we should let the grownups drive.
Don't you?