Another day, another mass murder taking place
somewhere across the fruited plane. One wonders where this
national rash of mass family murders has come from. It seems I
cannot turn on the TV, the radio or pick up a newspaper without
learning the fate of some group of children and their unlucky
custodial parent, aunt, uncle or grandparent. The 24-hour news
networks keep us appraised of all the sordid details. We no
longer have to wait until 11 to find out the who, what, when and
where. It is as if there is something in the national water
forcing the unhinged among us to step over the edge. The edge
has been slowing moving towards all of us over the last few
years. It isn't a big a step as it used to be.
In these days of instant celebrity and a
national obsession with victimhood, it is not surprising that
eventually a liberal group or two would come forward and decide
that a particular mass murderer deserved their unwavering
support. For one rash of killings we have the National
Organization of Women and the American Civil Liberties Union
uniting with professional whiners Katie Couric and Rosie
O'Donnell to raise money to defend our latest member of the
killer elite.
It is interesting that the target of this
national hand wringing would be the killer of five little
children. After all, everything liberals do is "for the
children." One would think that a woman who murdered five
members of the group used by the political left to fleece the
productive class, would be at the bottom of their sympathy list.
Make no mistake. It is a list. These groups do not go to bat for
just any mass murderer. They weigh all the pros and cons first.
There have been other female child killers who have not received
the blessing of the liberals. Susan Smith drowned her children
in a car…. but she blamed a member of another victim group,
automatically taking her off the "A" list. Then there is Darlie
Lynn Routier, who sits on death row convicted of stabbing two of
her kids to death in the family living room. Of course, she
didn't have the proper demeanor of a victim. Neither sad enough,
nor crazed enough.
The other mass killers of late have been men.
To the victim industry, it doesn't matter why men kill their
families. It is always the fault of the NRA and/or the
oppressive patriarchal hierarchy of our society that makes them
inherently unworthy of the various liberal groups selective
compassion. This leaves the hapless Houston woman, Andrea Yates,
who dragged her five little kids one at a time into the family
bath and snuffed out their young lives as they kicked and cried
for mamma to stop. Andrea is perfect. Crazy enough to leave
doubt in the minds of the masses and married to a man who
allowed her to continue to home school her kids despite mounting
evidence of mental instability. NOW and the ACLU, giving a nod
to the NEA (National Education eradication Association) would
tell us that home schooling is a mental disorder in and of
itself.
Normal people would look at such an act and
find little sympathy for the perpetrator. But alas! In today's
world, there is little normalcy. Certain groups have a need for
a sociologically contrary cause to take up against what society
has historically seen as unforgivable behavior. In order to
create an atmosphere of relativism and situational ethics, which
are both necessary to bring about the kind of society desired by
these people, no behavior is too heinous to excuse in the name
of politically correct orthodoxy. The little kids are secondary
considerations. They really do not matter and will not be
mentioned in the debate over the defense of their mother. They
are merely an inconvenient nuisance in the bigger issue of
female victimhood and the martyrdom of Andrea Yates to the
cause. The cause that is willing to forgive the unforgivable. To
look past the actions of the perpetrator. A cause willing to put
the deaths of the little kids last in order to promote a
political agenda. I'm ashamed of them.