Allegations resulting in congressional
investigations have suggested that the President may be hiding
information about what he knew prior to the attacks on the
United States. Using my 20/20 hindsight borrowed from the
Democratic National Committee, I have determined from careful
review of the events immediately following the 9/11 attacks that
members of the Senate leadership may have indeed sent anthrax
laced letters to themselves. There have been no denials from the
Senators in question. This lends credence to my call for an
independent investigation of Senators Patrick Leahy and Tom
Daschle. The very fact that only these two received anthrax
letters among members of the Senate makes all Americans
suspicious of how the Democrats got the anthrax in the first
place.
The silence in the media on this matter is
even more evidence of a wider conspiracy to engender feelings of
pity for the Democrats at a time when they were largely being
ignored due to the deaths of 3000 "regular" citizens. Further,
without adequate and independent study how will we know whether
or not the major news outlets including the New York Times and
the Washington Post were aware prior to these events that
something was perhaps going to happen to someone, somewhere.
That they failed to alert the American people is reprehensible.
There are other indicators that Democrats
staged the anthrax "scare". The letters, sent to both Senators
had handwriting that appeared written by a child or someone of
childlike mentality. This is indicative of a Democrat Senate
staff member or intern. There needs to be a committee formed to
look into the possibility that Senate staffers were involved.
Perhaps handwriting samples should be procured and each staff
member questioned to seek plausible denial of their alleged
involvement. If these theories are not investigated fully, the
deaths from the anthrax attacks may go unpunished for political
gain.
Another event we should consider taking a
hard look at is Democrat involvement and alleged prior knowledge
of the bombing of the USS Cole. After all, they must have known
of the danger of having an American warship refueling in Yemen.
Yemen has long been known as a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism.
There was a Democrat in charge of the military at the time. That
Democrat was reported to "loathe" the military and he had
control over the investigative agencies that failed to stop the
murder of the American sailors. I don't think it could be just a
coincidence that the same Senators receiving anthrax letters
were also in office at the time of the Cole disaster.
Then we have the bombings of two of our
embassies in Africa. Same Commander in Chief who oversaw the
Cole incident. The same two Senators in leadership positions in
the Democrat Party. Ambassadors in charge of both embassies
appointed by a Democrat President. Without a thorough airing of
these events, how can the American people be certain that the
Democrats associated with these events weren't aware before the
fact? How do we know that these so called "leaders" didn't allow
our citizens and citizens of Africa to die so they could prop up
President Clinton's image at a time when he was diddling interns
in the Oval Office?
However much we might hope for closure and
national healing, it doesn't stop with these Embassies. We need
to go back and look into the bombing of the Federal Courthouse
in Oklahoma City. While there is no evidence currently
available, investigators should not be frightened from their
duty to the American people to look into any involvement in this
tragedy by Democrats in the government. After all, by blowing up
the Federal building and pinning the crime on a so-called "right
wing extremist," the Democrats had everything to gain by
exposing the activities of the militia movement.
Using the current media acceptable practice
of 20/20 hindsight and looking at who gains from the activities
of terrorists and any other perpetrator of a negative event, it
is clear to me that the Democrats have questions to answer. Was
the Democrat Party involved in the murder of Chandra Levy? Did
they conspire to bring down Enron in order to embarrass the
President? Did they slip something in the drink of the Captain
of the Exxon Valdez to get back at the oil industry? Where were
they on December 7th, 1941? Without proper
investigation we may never know.