|
Americans
with Disabilities Act, my ticket to the Olympics
Now that the Supreme Court has found that our Constitution
provides an allowance for golf carts in the PGA, can the end of
competitive sports be on the horizon? How broad will the right
to special treatment for disabled athletes expand? When exactly
did government become the arbiter of every single aspects of
everyone's life? And…does this mean I get to go to the Olympics?
My specialty? The marathon. Now I can't actually run that far
because I am old, out of shape, have a damaged knee from weight
lifting 30 years ago and get tired after a couple of flights of
stairs. But I have some Nike's. I think that I should get to be
on the Olympic team because other than these small problems, I
can go the distance. I will need frequent rest stops meals, and
I think it is only fair that the other contestants stop and rest
when I do.
Or maybe I'll forego the Olympics and go directly to
professional sports. I don't see as well as I used to…so I
should get more strikes baseball. My knee prevents me from
jumping, so I'll need a ladder in basketball. I am not very
mobile in the pocket, so the defensive linemen will have to
count to ten before crossing the line of scrimmage. Tennis? I'll
need a guy standing behind me to hit the ball when I miss.
Hockey? Well I can't skate…so I guess I'll need one of those
walker looking things I see the little kids using at the
Iceoplex. After all, in the interest of fairness, I should be
given the same opportunity as those born as gifted
athletes…shouldn't I?
What is scary about all this, is that there are people in
this country who would actually agree that these are good ideas.
There are people who would handicap the athletic ability of
others to bring them down to a common level. People who see
sports and competition as a slap in the face of those less
fortunate. They would opt for a forced equality of outcome, even
if it meant reducing the quality of life for the majority. These
are people who will tell you that there is no such thing as
disability and to prove it, would gladly see you wear weights to
remove your competitive edge.
Kurt Vonnegut once wrote a short story about a society where
equality was the law. Athletic people were weighed down and
crippled, intelligent people had an implanted buzzer that would
go off in their heads if their cognition levels rose above an
approved level. The story was about a couple who threw off their
shackles and danced on television. They were graceful and
beautiful, but the police came in and killed them. The buzzers
in the heads of the viewers went off and they forgot what they
had seen. The sacrifice had been personal.
The American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) started out with
the paving stones of good intentions. Who could argue with
granting access to government buildings for taxpaying citizens
who were confined to wheelchairs. But the government did what
governments always do. They overstepped their authority. They
imposed the liberal ideals of compassion on the private sector.
They made access a right. And now the Supreme Court has made
participation in professional sports a Constitutional right
regardless of the ability of the participant. Any law, not
founded in reason has the potential to degrade into absurdity. A
stripper was not allowed to use a prop shower in her stage act
because the shower stall was not wheelchair accessible. Someone
want to explain how something this stupid helps the disabled?
What is worrisome is that the ADA proponents are not satisfied
with removing barriers to buildings, they want to legislate the
removal of barriers to participation and force the acceptance of
those with disabilities in all walks of life, even it certain
walks of life are damaged or destroyed. I am surprised that the
phrase "walks of life" has not yet been banned.
Of course I am going to get hate mail. But I don't have a
problem with people with actual disabilities having ramps into
libraries, or special parking spaces at the courthouse, or large
print on government documents. But try as I might, I can't find
the provision in my copy of the Constitution where the federal
government is given the right to demand a private business build
special accommodations for anyone. Where in the Bill of Rights
is the Ramp amendment? Or the Parking Space amendment? Where is
the right of access into non-taxpayer supported businesses? And
who thinks Braille on the buttons of drive up ATMs should be
dictated by federal law?
We are a Constitutional Republic. What that means is that the
good intentions of some does not equal a requirement by others.
The Founders of the Country were smarter than we are today. They
understood that unalienable rights didn't include anything
someone else would be required to provide. That is why there is
no right to housing, food, medical care or a parking space in
the Constitution.
Copyright © 2001 Write Winger Productions, All rights reserved

|