Opinion

     

11Apr10

   


VAT still a possibility


Last year I mentioned the rumor that the Obama administration was plotting the introduction of a tax new to the U.S., but an old reality in socialist Europe—the Value Added Tax (VAT). The name is likely the result of a long study by Public Relations wonks as more soothing than something more truthful such as Taxpayer Taxidermy Tax. Whatever it’s called, the bottom line is, the taxpayer is going to get skinned.

Today, former Federal Reserve Chairman and Obama advisor Paul Volcker said the United States may need to consider raising taxes to control deficits and that a European-style value-added tax could gain support. Volcker said he knew that the ideas weren't popular but that the outlook on entitlement spending and budget deficits was grim without some changes.  I take his remarks to mean that because the government has gone wild with uncontrollable spending and entitlements, someone must pay the piper--that would be you and me.

Value Added Tax adds a tax to every stage in the production of a product, all of which are passed on to the consumer. The term “value added” applies to the federal government. To the taxpayer, it’s actually a cost added tax. The government gets the value, the taxpayer gets the tax.

National Review Online Editor-at-large, Jonah Goldberg makes the point that if we are to become Europeanized, then some country must take our place. He recently wrote, “Europe is a free-rider. It can only afford to be Europe because we can afford to be America. The most obvious and most cited illustration of this fact is national defense. Europe’s defense budgets have been miniscule because Europeans can count on Uncle Sam to protect them. Britain, which has the most credible military in NATO after ours, has funded its butter account with its gun account. As Mark Steyn recently noted in ‘National Review’, from 1951 to 1997 the share of British government expenditure devoted to defense fell from 24 percent to 7 percent, while the share spent on health and welfare increased from 22 percent to 53 percent. And that was before New Labour started rolling back Thatcherism. If America Europeanizes, who’s going to protect Europe? Who’s going to keep the sea lanes open? Who’s going to contain Iran — China? Okay, maybe. But then who’s going to contain China?”

The Obama administration obviously hasn’t thought of that. Obama apparently believes that the hostile countries and terror groups of the world can be whipped into line by virtue of his golden-throated speeches, thus allowing his administration to spend all their time executing his plans to squeeze every nickel out of the taxpayers to pay for his notion of fairness and equality of outcome for the nearly 50% of Americans that pay no federal income tax. Those on the receiving end of Obama’s benevolence and beneficence applaud his goals. 

Goldberg says, “Economists such as Stanford’s Michael Boskin say Europeans have a standard of living about 30 percent lower than ours and are stagnating. Others note that the structural unemployment rate in Europe, particularly for young people (it’s over 20 percent in many countries), is socially devastating.”  Is that what we want, a lower living standard and fewer people working? Remember we have something the Europeans don’t—millions of illegal aliens that will likely be added as citizens during Obama’s term. They will be added to the number of people that don’t pay their own way, but vote for whatever candidate that promises them a free ride.  

VAT is just another step toward total socialization of the United States. This will be in addition to the other new taxes hidden in the Obama Care law that was just passed. On top of the other taxes, there is the proposed Carbon Tax. This will jack up your utility bill for gas and electricity in order to “save the planet.”  Like state sin taxes on tobacco; VAT, once in place, will be too much of a temptation to resist increasing by a percent or so whenever politicians want an extra few billion for their latest vote-buying giveaway scheme. It should be resisted vigorously.

E-mail me