|
Did you ever wonder how
Congress, which is mostly made up of lawyers, knows so much
about so many complex subjects? I used to wonder until I
finally came to the obvious conclusion that it doesn’t.
They’ve made a mess of almost everything they’ve set out to
fix. Perhaps they should stick to the duties set out in the
Constitution and leave micromanagement of things they know
nothing about to those who do.
Congress recently mandated that automobile manufacturers
must produce cars that get 35 MPG by 2020. This was part of
the last “energy bill” they passed. They didn’t say how the
manufacturers were supposed to reach this number, only that
they must comply. Could you imagine the founding fathers
mandating that horse breeders produce horses that must be
able to travel a certain number of miles per feed bag of
oats? Certainly not. That was never intended to be the job
of Congress.
Linda Chavez wrote recently in
Townhall.com, “In 2007,
the cost of a gallon of milk increased 26 percent; eggs went
up 40 percent; and a loaf of white bread went from $1.05 to
$1.28 from 2006 to 2008. Steep increases in the price of oil
have contributed to these higher costs, but the federal
government has played a pernicious role as well. By
mandating that oil companies increase the amount of ethanol
they blend with gasoline, the government has not only
artificially increased the cost of corn, which is what most
U.S. ethanol is made of, but has driven up the cost of other
grains as well. Inflated corn prices encourage farmers to
divert more acreage to corn, which means they plant less soy
and wheat, which, in turn, drives the prices of those
commodities up as well. The aggregate price of wheat, corn,
soy oil and soy meal in the U.S. will be $61.7 billion
higher in the 2007/2008 crop year than it was in
2005/2006…..Corn-based ethanol is inefficient as a fuel for
automobiles, reducing vehicle gas mileage by 20-30 percent
in vehicles using E85, the highest ethanol content fuel.
Fewer miles-per-gallon of gas essentially eliminates any
savings achieved, even by mixing ethanol with gasoline in
the lower 9 percent ethanol blends required in all U.S.
gasoline today. And of course, it also takes energy to
produce ethanol -- for farming and distilling the corn and
transporting the final product to the pump -- and much of
that energy will come from carbon-based fuels.”
Members of Congress are hardly
experts in this field so they relied on the Ethanol lobby
that was trying to influence Congress and get more subsidies
(hand outs). Another by-product of their mandate is a
shortage of staple foods around the world.
Another Congressional mandate
is the conversion from analog to digital television. I have
a small hand-held TV that I’ve had about ten years. I use it
in my pickup when out storm spotting, to look at TV weather
radar. After next February it will become useless and I’ll
have to buy a digital set. While DTV (digital television)
may provide a better picture and sound, it will cost many
people a lot of money either for new TV sets or converter
boxes. It may be a good move overall, but I don’t think it’s
the function of Congress to decree what kind of television
people must watch.
We are supposed to be a market
driven capitalist system. As such, I don’t think Congress
should spend its time coming up with laws that regulate and
order around industries that they know nothing about. Safety
regulations are okay and so are rules that prevent out and
out fraud. But telling the CEO how much money he can make is
really none of Congress’ business. The same goes for
corporate profit. It isn’t the job of Congress to punish
successful enterprises.
I don’t want to leave anyone
out who is due for a share of the blame. None of these laws
would have been enacted without the signature of the
president. There are more than a few of these measures that
wouldn’t be a problem had the president used his veto pen.
From what’s being offered on the election menu, don’t look
for things to get better any time soon. |