Opinion

     

1Sept09

   


Obama going after CIA


Going back on a previous decision not to open an official investigation into Democrat allegations that the CIA “tortured” captured terrorists in order to obtain information about al Qaeda planned attacks on the United States, President Obama has given the okay to Attorney General Eric Holder to proceed with a witch hunt and has appointed a special prosecutor to dig up whatever he can to discredit the spy agency and if possible, link the alleged wrong-doing authorization to either Dick Cheney or President Bush.

In addition Obama has decided to take the job of interrogating captured terrorists away from the CIA and move the responsibility to the FBI, to be run out of the White House. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that he is appointing an Interrogation Czar, since he seems to have one for everything else.

In his column this week, political analyst Dick Morris wrote, “So he has decided to throw a few CIA interrogators to the wolves. The report that Holder released to accompany his decision to name a special prosecutor itself showed the trivial nature of the charges against these patriotic anti-terror investigators. Among the allegations prominently featured in the report is that the mastermind of the attack on the USS Cole was scrubbed with a rough brush in the bath so as to cause him pain. Our heartless interrogators also threatened that they could bring in his family and parents for questioning. How do these "tortures" compare with the deaths of more than a dozen American sailors roasted to death in flames or drowned in the sea?”

The decision to reverse his previous decision not to go after the CIA is no doubt an effort to placate his political base—the radical left, who are wondering what happened to its candidate that vociferously opposed the war in Iraq and promised immediate withdrawal, but now, once in the driver’s seat, is continuing with the Bush timetable. This is likely to turn into a media circus, which will take attention away from the seemingly endless supply of messes the administration is making with the economy, health reform and attempts to convince the citizenry that the government knows better than you how to manage your life.

Debra J. Saunders, writing in Town Hall Daily reminds us of Attorney General Holder’s experience with pardons: “When he served as deputy attorney general, now Attorney General Eric Holder gave a "neutral leaning positive" recommendation that led to President Bill Clinton's pardoning of gazillionaire fugitive Marc Rich, who was on the lam in Switzerland hiding from federal charges of fraud, evading more than $48 million in taxes, racketeering and trading oil with Iran in violation of a U.S. embargo.
Holder also had a role in the 1999 Clinton pardons of 16 Puerto Rico independence terrorists -- members of the bomb-happy FALN or the splinter group Los Macheteros -- who had been convicted on such charges as bank robbery, possession of explosives and participating in a seditious conspiracy -- even though none of the 16 had applied for clemency. As the Los Angeles Times reported, two of the 16 refused to accept the pardon -- as it required them to renounce violence -- while another later was killed in a shootout with federal agents.”
While she suggests pardons for the CIA men, it would be better for all if the president issued amnesty for the CIA interrogators. A pardon would probably be unacceptable since it implies guilt.

This whole business has the potential of becoming yet another colossal failure on the part of the new administration. I can’t think of any other president who has tried to micromanage so many facets of the government by appointing czars who report and are accountable only to him.

The notion that Muslim terrorist interrogations are to be run from the White House is laughable. I suppose the president will decide what tactics are suitable to gain secrets from the toughest, most dangerous high value terrorists. I assume he will specify the size feather to be used to tickle the information out of the prisoners. Tough questions will no doubt be prefaced with “please” and “pretty please with sugar and candy on it.”


 

E-mail me